Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(55)
The crowns were removed to standardize a 14-mm root height and the endodontic treatment was performed using a step-back preparation technique.
At the end of the curative treatment, agronomic parameters were determined including the shoot and root fresh (SFW and RFW) and dry weights (SDW and RDW) and the plant shoot and root height (SH and RH, respectively).
The results for F. solani f. sp. cucurbitae (FSC5) revealed that T. harzianum increased significantly the root height (16.6 cm), root fresh (0.47 g), and dry weight (0.23 g).
Average tree model root height was used to determine the number of viral generations since infection with a 95% confidence interval (CI).
The root height was modelled as a normal distribution with mean = 1.13 Ma, based on the divergence time between C. monspeliensis and C. populifolius previously estimated using fossil calibrations [30].
However, a stronger prior is desirable for the root height in order to estimate evolutionary rates, and thus, with values above 0.20, the MCMC failed to converge to a coherent result, with all node ages approaching zero.
Similar(5)
All three scenarios were using the same tip dates, but varying root heights as exterior calibration points (red/arctic fox divergence time estimate).
We tested three scenarios in BEAST, all three using the same tip dates, but varying root heights as exterior calibration points (Table 2).
This program estimates the coalescence distances or root heights (μ tMRCA) of the most recent common ancestor for a given set of sequences from a species (supplementary table S1, Supplementary Material online).
The influence of different root heights on the divergence time estimate for the red fox from the arctic fox (Vulpes lagopus) was evaluated by performing different simulations in BEAST.
However, each BEAST run converged on the youngest time frame allowed by the prior for the speciation event (i.e., close to the different minimum root heights of 1.75 million years (My) and 5.1 My, respectively; see Table 2).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com