Sentence examples for role to interpret from inspiring English sources
Whether or not the Koran makes the dress mandatory is irrelevant since it's not the state's role to interpret the Koran, and since most religious sects have a range of interpretations of their sacred writings.
Phillips said it was not his role to interpret Ashcroft's precise tax status.
As the court moved right during the past 20 years, Stevens increasingly saw it as his role to interpret the Constitution with fidelity to all of American history, rejecting the claim of Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas and Judge Robert Bork that the original understanding of the 18th-century framers is all that matters.
In trials using the HADS the MID estimate of 1.5 points will play an important role to interpret treatment effects.
This level of interest and questionnaire return rate illustrates that most community members wanted information regarding what was happening with the research project, but they did not view it as their role to interpret the information gathered or plan an intervention.
The N.L.D. had hoped that President Thein Sein could talk the Constitutional Court into changing the controversial wording, but the court demurred, claiming that its role is to interpret, not change, the Constitution.
Too often, he complains, the court's judges, using techniques of a now antiquated common law tradition, have made new law, when their proper role is to interpret the constitution.
This approach is useful to measure how comparable the two configurations of roles are, and to interpret each role.
In any case, a jury's role is not to interpret the law, but to apply the judge's legal instructions to the facts.
It has turned out to be surprisingly relevant to humans -- by and large, people have a worm-type genome repeated four times over -- and is expected to play a major role in helping to interpret the human genome.
It is not for unelected judges to rule on what the press can or cannot print, they thunder.The senior MP I quoted earlier thinks that is ludicrously unfair: it is precisely the role of judges to interpret the laws passed by Parliament, especially when Parliament passes laws that include clashing rights.
