Sentence examples for robust review process from inspiring English sources

"We are just beginning what will be a robust review process," Senate foreign relations committee chairman Bob Corker said in an email.

James O'Reilly, a professor at the University of Cincinnati College of Law, says the FDA essentially abdicated its responsibility as a food regulator in 1997, when it proposed rules to streamline a more robust review process that had become backlogged.

Administration officials said they were simply trying to create a more robust regulatory review process as the state tries to revive the upstate economy and tackle a $24.4 billion budget deficit over the next three years.

An Imperial College spokeswoman said: "The College has taken a number of actions to improve its culture of care since 2012 [including] revised governance structure; more robust ethical review process; better systems for training and sharing good practice".

"Bayer's acquisition by Monsanto has undergone a lengthy and robust regulatory review process by the relevant competition authorities," he said. .

Given our robust chart review process, and because most outcomes will be determined through linkage to administrative data, we expect few data to be missing.

Admittance into the partnership is based on a robust panel review process that critically assesses a country's ability to administer the financial grant that is awarded from the GPE and to execute the proposed education development strategy.

A report released last week alleged that his "failure to maintain a robust planning and review process has led to confusion and lack of focus among some staff members".

As observed in the CTEP/NCI review process of early clinical trial proposals, robust preclinical data generally provide strong rationale and are considered to be of high priority for clinical evaluation.

That claim rings particularly hollow given that the current review process provided detainees in Afghanistan is even less robust than the one the Bush Administration provided to detainees at Guantanamo Bay and that the Supreme Court in 2008 struck down as inadequate.

We have already taken steps to ensure that the peer review process of the Journal of International Medical Research is much more robust and are confident that OASPA will find our processes more than sufficiently strengthened when they undertake the review.