The phrase "robust hypothesis" is correct and usable in written English
It can be used in scientific or academic contexts to describe a hypothesis that is strong, well-supported, and likely to withstand scrutiny.
Example: "The researchers presented a robust hypothesis that explained the observed phenomena in their study."
Alternatives: "strong hypothesis" or "solid hypothesis"
Section 7 discusses connections of the game-theoretic framework with the theory of robust hypothesis testing.
A robust hypothesis was considered critical while non-clinical pharmacokinetic studies were also considered valuable.
Among others, two techniques are very useful for robust cognitive radio spectrum sensing: the robust hypothesis testing [75] and the robust matched filtering [76, 77].
Examples include classical settings in network information theory such as Slepian-Wolf source coding and multiple access channels, classical settings in statistics such as robust hypothesis testing, and new settings at the intersection of networking and statistics such as distributed estimation problems for sensor networks.
A robust hypothesis for the origin of genetic code should also address or predict the following gross features of the codon table: absence of codons for D-amino acids secondary codon patterns for some amino acids confinement of synonymous positions to third position limitation to 20 amino acids instead of a number closer to 64 relation of stop codon patterns to amino acid coding patterns.
Thus, the worth of a particular phylogenetic tree may range from trivial to substantial, and its accuracy from mere guess to robust hypothesis.
While this publication cannot provide a final conclusion, it allows the development of some robust hypotheses that should be investigated further before such plants can be considered to be safe for health and the environment.
Under some important, but not necessarily robust hypotheses, turbulence parameters can be retrieved, mainly from the radar echo power and from the spectral width of Doppler echoes (e.g., Hocking 1985, 1999; Fukao et al. 1994).
The output thus represents a powerful functional genomic information resource for mammalian myobiology, and should generate robust hypotheses for a host of downstream in vitro and in vivo validations.
Results from our tests of this approach clearly indicate that the nu ITS2 rRNA data possess considerable power to reconstruct reasonably robust hypotheses that are congruent with past work that employed markers that have been deemed "more conservative" than the nu ITS2 rRNA gene.
Most important, though, would a better taxon sampling within Leptocerinae allow more robust hypotheses about tribal and generic relationships to be made.
