Sentence examples for robust equivalence from inspiring English sources

Reaching terminological precision in bilingual dictionaries is essential for robust equivalence between terms of source and target languages.

Nominal equivalence (equivalence of the predicted outcome) does not imply robustness equivalence.

By simulation, we investigate and compare the performance of production optimization by mean variance optimization, robust optimization, certainty equivalence optimization, and the reactive strategy.

This provides a more robust, alternative verification of equivalence ratio, based on measured air flow, than the phi meter used in other reported work.

We demonstrate by open-loop simulations of a two-phase synthetic oil field that the mean variance criterion is able to mitigate the significant inherent geological uncertainties better than the alternative certainty equivalence and robust optimization strategies that have been suggested for production optimization.

Francez et al. (1992, Formal Aspects Comput.4, 582 591) propose a notion of completion to transform a non-equivalence-robust fairness notion to an equivalence-robust one while maintaining several properties of the source.

We focus here on equivalence-robust fairness notions where equivalence computations are either all fair or all unfair.

Under a series of equivalent transformation, the equivalence of this problem and the robust state feedback H∞ control problem for standard state-space uncertain time-delay discrete-time systems is presented.

Moreover, for most systems we obtain a fairness notion, which we refer to as SG+, such that SG+ is the strongest fairness notion that is both implementable and equivalence-robust.

The simulations demonstrate that certainty equivalence optimization and robust optimization are risky strategies.

Charles R. Taylor and John B. Ford elaborate upon this last point in the second chapter, "Research Methods for International Advertising Studies: A Practical Guide". Exploring issues facing cross-national researchers, Taylor and Ford formulate 11 guidelines to help conceptualise robust studies and establish construct equivalence between research settings.