robust enough to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "robust enough to" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe the strength or durability of something in relation to its ability to handle challenges or demands. Example: "The software is robust enough to handle a large number of simultaneous users without crashing."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

This opera is not robust enough to withstand such treatment.

The Guardian - Music

I started believing that I'm robust enough to take it.

The Guardian

Even with all of these, our final game is definitely robust enough to be considered "playable".

Cornell University

A communications and collaboration infrastructure robust enough to support advanced network, voice, and web-based services.

Stanford University

Such coating is robust enough to resist water flushing and organic solvents.

Polymer

Organisations' information-recording and storage were not robust enough to allow good management and care.

The Guardian

He also questioned whether the new law was robust enough to withstand a legal challenge.

The New York Times

The system is not robust enough to withstand a rise in interest rates.

The Guardian - Opinion

It has to be robust enough to withstand all the complexity and all the negotiations".

The New York Times - Arts

Today's policy announcements will need to be robust enough to stand up to aggressive scrutiny.

The Guardian - Opinion

The resulting sausage was robust enough to survive being "boiled with impunity".

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "robust enough to", ensure the context clearly defines what the subject needs to withstand. Specificity enhances clarity and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "robust enough to" when a weaker term like "adequate" or "sufficient" would be more accurate. Exaggerating the strength can undermine credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "robust enough to" functions as an adjective phrase modifying a noun, indicating that something possesses the necessary strength or resilience for a specific purpose. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is a correct and usable phrase. Examples from Ludwig illustrate its use in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

35%

Science

33%

Academia

12%

Less common in

Formal & Business

10%

Encyclopedias

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "robust enough to" is a versatile and grammatically sound construction used to express that something possesses the necessary strength or resilience for a given purpose. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is correct and usable. Its prevalence across diverse domains, as evidenced by the numerous examples found in Ludwig, underscores its broad applicability. The phrase is considered neutral in register and finds frequent use in news, scientific, and academic contexts. While "strong enough to", "durable enough to", and "resilient enough to" serve as suitable alternatives, "robust enough to" often implies a capacity to handle complex challenges. When employing this phrase, it's crucial to provide clear context about the specific demands or conditions the subject must withstand.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

strong enough to

Emphasizes physical or inherent strength as the qualifying factor.

resilient enough to

Highlights the ability to recover quickly from difficulties.

durable enough to

Focuses on the capacity to withstand wear, pressure, or damage.

capable enough to

Highlights the competence or skill to perform a specific task.

sufficiently sturdy to

Emphasizes the firmness and stability required for a particular purpose.

adequate to

Implies a basic level of suitability or competence.

tough enough to

Highlights the ability to endure hardship or difficulty.

stout enough to

Focuses on the ability to resist pressure or impact.

serviceable to

Emphasizes functional adequacy for the task at hand.

able to withstand

Highlights the capability to oppose and endure against external forces.

FAQs

How can I use "robust enough to" in a sentence?

Use "robust enough to" to describe something that is strong or durable enough to withstand specific conditions or demands. For example, "The system is robust enough to handle a large volume of data".

What are some alternatives to "robust enough to"?

You can use alternatives like "strong enough to", "durable enough to", or "resilient enough to" depending on the specific context.

Is it better to say "robust enough to" or "strong enough to"?

Both phrases are correct, but "robust enough to" often implies a broader capability to withstand complex or challenging conditions, while "strong enough to" typically refers to physical strength.

When should I use "robust enough to" instead of "reliable enough to"?

"Robust enough to" emphasizes the capacity to withstand stress or damage, while "reliable enough to" highlights consistent performance over time. Choose based on whether you are emphasizing resilience or dependability.