With varying road width conditions, vehicles park randomly and people walk on the roads since there are no pavements.
It then became a game to manipulate the positions of these three circular sets to achieve minimum road width.
I noticed that in configurations where the road width is not minimal, these lines are not parallel, or, alternatively, only two of these four points sufficed to define the road edges with the other two lying within.
Gary Hewitt Hansns then broadened the problem: A follow-up question: given the turning radius r, road width w and infinitesimal car size, what is the minimum number of turning arcs needed to reverse the car?
The minimum road width w for an n-point turn with radius r of an infinitesimal-size car is: w = 2 * r / n Giovanni's solution was actually what Professor John McKay had in mind when proposing this problem.
For example, the total road width is defined as a single lane of equivalent road width (say 10.5-m wide lane to simulate a 3 lane roadway).
Yet, little is known about the roles played by road width vs road length.
It has also been shown that road width might affect the safety benefits.
Comparing with the road width, the transmission range of a node is much larger.
Road width was defined as the total width measured in feet, excluding shoulders.
However, road width and air gap have least impact on the creep rate of FDM processed prototypes.
