The phrase "risky contract" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English.
You can use it when describing an agreement or obligation that carries a high level of potential danger, loss, or uncertainty. Here are some examples: - The company decided not to enter into a risky contract with the new supplier due to their unstable financial records. - John regretted signing the risky contract with the investment firm, as he lost a large sum of money in the stock market crash. - After careful consideration, the government chose to award the construction project to the company with the most experience, rather than the one offering the lowest bid, in order to avoid any potential risks associated with a risky contract.
Given this profoundly hostile environment, why would Maximus want to take on such a risky contract?
This additive decomposition of the contract's cash flows may be employed in pricing of a counterparty risky contract.
The key concept in the context of counterparty risk is the counterparty risky contract, which will be examined in the foregoing subsection.
We now address the question raised in Section 2.8.2: can we disentangle the counterparty risk-free valuation of a credit risky contract from the CRR valuation?
According to the prevailing practical approach, the full price for a counterparty risky contract is typically obtained by combining, at least implicitly, the so-called clean price of the basic contract (A,0) with various valuation adjustments.
On the one hand, according to Proposition 1, the counterparty risky contract ((A^{sharp },mathcal {X})) admits the following decomposition left(A^{sharp},mathcal{X} right)=(A,mathcal{X})+left(A^{text{CCR}},0right), (70).
DealBook » As One JPMorgan Trader Sold Risky Contracts, Another One Bought Them | For hedge funds that could smell blood in the water, it seemed to be an opportunity to take on JPMorgan Chase and win.
Freelancers and small businesses can't afford attorney fees, and so choose to write their own risky contracts, or go without a contract at all, leading to lawsuits when things inevitably go awry.
The bulk of the payments at issue cover AIG Financial Products, the unit of the company that sold credit default swaps, the risky contracts that caused massive losses for the insurer.
At issue is a rider that would allow Wall Street banks to trade certain financial derivatives from subsidiaries that are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. -- potentially putting taxpayers on the hook for losses caused by the risky contracts.
It turned out to be one of the countries with the least remunerative and riskiest contracts of all.
