Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
FSWs in higher risk venue were less likely to change residence, less likely to use condoms with clients, earned less per client, but had more months engaging in sexual service, more working locations and more clients each month.
HIV-positive subjects, drug users and FSWs in higher risk venue were less likely to change residence, less likely to use condoms with clients, and earned less per client, but had more working locations and more clients each month.
Similar(58)
The data from high risk venues (PLACE-data) was analysed using SPSS version 15.
Considering the significant differences between FSWs working in higher and lower risk venues, interventions should be tailored for each type.
FSWs who worked in lower risk sex venues were also more likely to move during the year (AHR 1.55, 95% CI 1.03-2.35), compared to those working in higher risk venues.
The least mobile FSWs were from Kaiyuan, worked in higher risk venues, were more likely to use drugs and be HIV-infected.
Because FSWs characteristics differ according to the venue at which they work, future prevention work should tailor programs according to venue with a particular focus on FSWs in higher risk venues.
A study to understand mobility, risk patterns, and HIV/STI rates of FSWs in different entertainment venues in China found that FSWs in higher risk venues were more mobile than those from other establishments [ 11].
HIV prevention messages (on posters and in pamphlets) and free condoms have been shown to be effective in other risk venues associated with sexual activity (e.g., bars/clubs, bathhouses) [ 19, 20].
FSWs in higher risk venues included more drug users and HIV-positive women who reported lower condom use rates, earned less per client, had worked as a commercial sex worker for longer, and had more clients each month.
At baseline, FSWs from higher risk venues were significantly more likely to have HIV (p < 0.01), syphilis (p < 0.05), and HSV-2 (p < 0.01) but not more likely to have gonorrhea, chlamydia, or trichomonas (p > 0.05).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com