Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(34)
Therefore, surgeons must be aware of a higher risk of cup malpositioning using the MIS anterolateral approach.
In that study, the use of minimally invasive approaches increased the risk of cup positioning outside the safe zone by a factor of 6.
Age at revision arthroplasty of less than 60 years increased the risk of cup re-revision for any reason and due to aseptic loosening.
The use of 28-mm prosthesis heads rather than 22-mm heads reduced the risk of cup revision (HR = 0.2, CI: 0.1 0.5; p = 0.001).
The crude RR of HA coating for the risk of cup re-revision for any reason was 1.0 (95% CI: 0.7 1.4) (Table 4 and Figure 1).
Use of the Harris-Galante cup enhanced the risk of cup re-revision due to aseptic loosening and for any reason when compared with the Trilogy cup.
Similar(26)
We used random-effects modeling to obtain mean differences in cup angulation and relative risk (RR) of cup positioning outside Lewinnek's safe zone.
Absence of postoperative demarcation at the acetabular cement-bone interface has been related to a reduced risk of aseptic cup loosening (Ranawat et al. 1995, Garcia-Cimbrelo et al. 1997, Ritter et al. 1999, Flivik et al. 2005).
We also computed the risk ratio (RR) of cup placement outside Lewinnek's 'safe zone'.
Still, she added, "Even if it did increase the risk of dislodging the cup, that shouldn't prevent sex just put a towel down".
The stem not being revised at the index revision increased the risk of a second cup revision by 78% (RR = 1.8, CI: 1.2 2.6).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com