The phrase "right of suffrage" is correct and usable in written English.
You could use it to describe the right of citizens to cast a vote in an election. For example, "The right of suffrage is a key part of any democracy."
A second deeply rooted principle is the right of suffrage.
It states, "No idiot or insane person shall enjoy the right of suffrage".
The right of suffrage is the preeminent right contained in the Declaration of Rights, for without this basic freedom all others would be diminished.
And a fourth would remove a clause from the State Constitution that states "no idiot or insane person shall enjoy the right of suffrage".
And that is a real problem, it seems to me, under Article II, because in fact there is no right of suffrage under Article II.
There's a right of suffrage in voting for the legislature, but Article II makes it very clear that the legislature can itself appoint the electors.
Another American Labor Party member who was seeking the Democratic nomination for State Senate challenged the Wilson-Pakula law as "an invasion of the rights of suffrage of a duly qualified voter," but judges rejected that challenge.
Primarily for this reason, I am infinitely sympathetic with the protest carried out by Hong Kong's young people in 2014, the so-called 'umbrella revolution,' when they realized their right of universal suffrage could be 'cashed out' by being required to vote only for candidates for chief executive who have been either approved or assigned in advance by China's central government.
And boy, is his language passionate: The right of equal suffrage among the States is another exceptionable part of the Confederation.
Spencer's commitment to the right of universal suffrage likewise wanes in his later writings.
The "right to ignore the state" and the right of universal suffrage are two essential political rights for Spencer.
