The phrase "right of speech" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in discussions about freedom of expression or legal rights related to speaking or expressing opinions.
Example: "In a democratic society, every citizen should have the right of speech to voice their opinions without fear of retribution."
Alternatives: "freedom of speech" or "right to speak".
Mr. Duffy said his organization would not "tolerate anyone berating a Gold Star family member for exercising his or her right of speech or expression".
It said: "The right of speech for those who speak up for their rights and the livelihoods of people are of very high value to FMO … FMO decided to suspend all activities in Honduras, effective immediately.
"The right of speech!" John C. Calhoun used these words to defend his actions on the Senate floor in the summer of 1841.
The filibuster is the "right of speech," after all, not the right to lurk off-stage and treacherously kill worthy legislation.
"Election year or not, the VFW will not tolerate anyone berating a Gold Star family member for exercising his or her right of speech or expression," said Brian Duffy, head of the veterans organization.
"Election year or not, the VFW will not tolerate anyone berating a Gold Star family member for exercising his or her right of speech or expression," Brian Duffy, commander-in-chief of the VFW, said, using the term for families whose relatives were killed in battle.
Judicial consideration of the collision of the investigatory function with constitutionally protected rights of speech and assembly is a recent development in our constitutional law.
The New Jersey Supreme Court reversed the judgment of conviction, holding that appellee's rights of speech and assembly under the New Jersey Constitution had been violated.
What system can we design that would best protect our constitutional rights of speech, privacy, and access to information in this changing landscape?
This talk highlights how conflicts over the rights of speech and assembly between the government and demonstrators resolved itself into contestations over public space in the city.
Now they must fight for our fundamental — in America, our constitutional — rights of speech and assembly and against unreasonable search and seizure.
