Sentence examples for right of integrity from inspiring English sources

Focusing on the rights and freedoms of creators, both systems recognize certain inalienable moral rights, such as a right to attribution and a right of integrity.

The right of integrity protects authors from having their copyrighted works altered in such a fashion as to constitute a "distortion" or "mutilation" of the original work, or in a way that harms the author's reputation or honour.

The right to object to derogatory treatment, or "right of integrity", is considered by Bently and Sherman to be "one of the most important of the innovations in the 1988 Act".

Cases vary as to how the right of integrity should be interpreted, with some judges saying that "distortion" or "mutilation" should be taken to be part of the wider clause on reputation and honour to avoid subjective decisions, and others interpreting each clause as distinct types of violation.

With the 1988 Act, however, four distinct moral rights were recognised: the right to be identified as the author (the right of paternity), the right to object to derogatory treatment (the right of integrity), the right to object to false attribution, and the right to privacy in private films and photographs.

Found in the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, the moral rights are the right to be identified as the author of a work, known as the right of paternity, the right to object to derogatory treatment of a work, known as the right of integrity, the right not to be identified as the author of someone else's work, and the right to privacy.

These waiver provisions would be especially prejudicial to Canadian authors, as they have moral rights in their works including the rights of integrity and association.

In fact, while the ECHR and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights consider mental integrity as a right to mental-health, pendant of the right of physical integrity understood as physical health, a more complex dimension of mental integrity is elicited by neurotechnology.

A law had been drafted that would make the practice legal, but it was met with resistance from pediatricians who saw the procedure as a violation of the basic right of physical integrity.

The problems with this argument are (i) that it is pretextual, in that concerns with bodily integrity seem limited to male circumcision; (ii) bodily integrity per se is not generally considered as a fundamental right; and (iii) the international treaty frequently cited as the basis for this right of bodily integrity does not actually assert such a right [ 45].

"My parents strove to instil principles and moral virtues, the sense of right and wrong, of integrity, in their children," Smith wrote in his memoirs.