Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
This would explain why at low functional richness higher species richness (more redundancy) makes communities less vulnerable to environmental change.
The increase of allelic richness together with genotypic richness reaches a plateau soon after 20 MLG at levels of genotypic richness more commonly found in the wild.
A strong correlation between genotypic and allelic richness was observed at the lower levels of genotypic richness, between 1 and 20, representative of levels commonly manipulated in experiments (r = 0.904, p < 0.001), although it became marginal at higher levels of genotypic richness more typically observed in natural meadows (G > 20).
Similar(57)
As exposure to stress increased, however, relations between the stability of individual functional groups and functional group richness became more variable, with some demonstrating more neutral or non-linear relations.
Across the Americas and in the subregions, similarity in species richness depended more on environmental distance than on geographic distance, whereas similarity in species composition depends more on geographical distance than on environmental distance.
Changes in genera richness proved more reliable in predicting changes in species richness than changes in family richness.
Incorporating minimum area requirements into maps of potential species richness produces more conservative and defensible maps.
Trait variation among species reduced species richness, but more so for traits associated with competition for space.
Regrowth with rock habitat had higher reptile richness, and more old growth-associated taxa, than regrowth without rock habitat.
Herb richness is more strongly correlated with tree and shrub density than with tree and shrub richness (r = −0.472, p < 0.05).
However, we found a strong biome effect: deadwood volume and species richness were more correlated in boreal forests than in temperate forests.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com