rich of

USAGE SUMMARY

"rich of" is not correct and usable in written English.
However, you could use the phrase "rich in" correctly. Example sentence: "The farmer's land was rich in soil, providing him with a bountiful harvest every year."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

49 human-written examples

The rich, of course.

The Economist

The very rich, of course.

The New Yorker

For the rich, of course, childcare's a non-issue.

The Guardian - Opinion

He is also survived by his brother, Robert N. Rich of Stamford, nephews Christopher Rich of Salem, VA, Thomas L. Rich of Stamford, and nieces Priscilla Rich of Boone, NC, and Martha Andrus of Boulder, CO.

The New York Times

Mr. Zapatero recently warned the rich of higher taxes.

The New York Times

The seriously rich, of course, are still spending freely.

The Economist

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

11 human-written examples

"Tourists remind the super-rich of their wealth and their social status.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

It is the most nutrient-rich of the world's cereals and the most widely planted crop.

The Economist

It's the most feature-rich of VZW's offerings, save he lack of camera.

TechCrunch

The problem is that New York is the most delegate-rich of the remaining April states.

Huffington Post

Faba bean is the most protein-rich and starch-rich of the three studied crops.

Biotechnology for Biofuels

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use the phrase "rich in" instead of "rich of" to maintain grammatical correctness.

Common error

Don't substitute "in" with "of" after "rich". Remember that "rich" typically takes the preposition "in" to indicate what something abounds with.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "rich of" is typically intended to function as a descriptive adjective phrase, aiming to specify what a noun abounds with. However, this construction is grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI reports that this phrase is not correct in written English.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "rich of" is generally considered grammatically incorrect in modern English. Ludwig AI confirms this, suggesting the use of ""rich in"" as a standard and correct alternative. While some examples exist, they do not legitimize the phrase's use. It should be avoided in all contexts, whether formal, neutral, or informal. The proper phrase to use when describing abundance is ""rich in"", ensuring clear and correct communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

rich in

Standard and grammatically correct alternative to express abundance.

abundant in

Focuses on the plentiful presence of something.

full of

Simple and direct way to indicate that something contains a lot of something else.

replete with

More formal and emphasizes completeness.

teeming with

Suggests an overflowing quantity, often used for living things.

wealthy in

Emphasizes the possession of something valuable.

overflowing with

Highlights the abundance exceeding capacity.

laden with

Implies being heavily burdened or filled.

flush with

Indicates a temporary state of abundance, often of money or resources.

generous with

Describes a tendency to give freely.

FAQs

How should I correctly use "rich" with a preposition?

The correct preposition to use with "rich" when describing abundance is "in", not "of". Use "rich in" followed by the element that is abundant.

What's a good substitute for the incorrect phrase "rich of"?

A suitable substitute is "rich in", which accurately conveys the meaning of abundance or containing a lot of something.

Is "rich of" ever grammatically correct?

In most contexts, "rich of" is grammatically incorrect. The standard and accepted form is "rich in".

Can you give me an example of how to use "rich in" correctly?

Instead of saying "This soil is rich of nutrients", say "This soil is "rich in" nutrients".