rich for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "rich for" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to express a sense of abundance or suitability, but it lacks proper context and clarity. Example: "The resources in this area are rich for development." (Note: "rich in" would be more appropriate.)

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

46 human-written examples

It's rich for exploration".

The Guardian - Music

Needs to be rich for the lobster.

The New York Times - Food

They're very rich, for starters.

The Guardian

Too rich for my tastes.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

A little rich for many palates, yes.

The Guardian

Mirrors made Venice rich for two centuries.

The New York Times - Books

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

10 human-written examples

My consciousness became richer for it.

The New York Times

No one was the richer for it.

The New Yorker

Fred Waitzkin's readers are richer for it.

The New York Times - Books

Rovio is undoubtedly richer for it.

The Guardian - Opinion

Life got harder for me, but much richer for us.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming for clarity and correctness, consider replacing "rich for" with more precise alternatives like "abundant in" or "well-suited for" depending on the intended meaning.

Common error

Avoid using "rich for" in formal or academic writing. It's often perceived as grammatically incorrect or imprecise. Opt for alternatives such as "rich in", "suitable for", or "abundant in" to maintain a professional tone.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "rich for" functions primarily as a descriptive modifier, attempting to express that something is abundant or well-endowed in relation to a particular purpose or context. However, Ludwig AI indicates that it is grammatically questionable.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

42%

Science

26%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Wiki

8%

Encyclopedias

7%

Reference

7%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "rich for" is a frequently encountered expression aiming to convey abundance or suitability. However, Ludwig AI classifies it as grammatically questionable. While prevalent in contexts such as News & Media, its imprecision can undermine clarity in formal writing. To ensure accuracy, consider replacing "rich for" with alternatives like "rich in", "suitable for", or "abundant in". Prioritize grammatical correctness and context-appropriate phrasing for effective communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

abundant in

Emphasizes plentiful presence of something, focusing on quantity rather than potential.

suitable for

Indicates appropriateness or fitness for a particular purpose or situation.

fruitful for

Suggests a potential for positive results or benefits in a specific area.

ideal for

Implies that something is perfectly matched or tailored for a specific need or circumstance.

ripe for

Suggests a state of readiness or maturity, indicating an opportune time for action.

well-suited for

Similar to 'suitable for', but with a slightly stronger emphasis on compatibility.

generous in

Highlights the giving or providing of something in a large or plentiful amount.

profuse in

Indicates a very abundant or extravagant supply of something.

overflowing with

Suggests an extreme abundance, to the point of being excessive.

well-endowed with

Implies that something possesses a significant amount of desirable qualities or resources.

FAQs

What's a more grammatically sound alternative to "rich for"?

Depending on the context, you can use phrases like "rich in", "suitable for", or "abundant in".

Is "rich for" considered formal or informal language?

While frequently used, "rich for" is generally considered less formal and may be perceived as grammatically incorrect in formal contexts. Opt for more precise alternatives in academic or professional writing.

How can I use "rich in" correctly in a sentence?

Use "rich in" to describe something that has a lot of a particular quality or substance. For example, "This soil is rich in nutrients."

What are some situations where "rich for" might be acceptable, even if not ideal?

In informal conversations or creative writing, "rich for" might be used for stylistic effect or emphasis. However, always consider your audience and the overall tone of your writing.