revocation of rights

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "revocation of rights" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in legal, political, or social contexts to refer to the act of taking away or canceling someone's rights or privileges. Example: "The new legislation led to the revocation of rights for certain groups, sparking widespread protests."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

Hulu just released a trailer for its adaptation of Margaret Atwood's The Handmaid's Tale, a science fiction tale in which the U.S. Government has been toppled by a theocratic authoritarian dictatorship and women suffer a horrible revocation of rights.

TechCrunch

In such a case, and after a reasonable period of time has elapsed, authors and performers should be able to benefit from a mechanism for the revocation of rights allowing them to transfer or license their rights to another person.

European Parliament

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

This seemed to be a sensible assumption; as fevered as the talk over immigration has been on the right, few have threatened a mass revocation of the rights of green-card holders.

The New Yorker

For those who would not know their place and were not assassinated, the punishment was often the revocation of whatever rights of citizenship they had.

The Guardian - Opinion

As I conclude another report about discriminatory urban planning, the revocation of residency rights, parallel military and civilian justice systems for children, or punitive demolitions, I can't help but feel like I'd be better off at home, making my voice heard where it really matters.

The Guardian

In recent years alone, the Israeli Supreme Court has affirmed discriminatory citizenship laws, the destruction of an ancient Muslim cemetery, and the revocation of residency rights of Palestinians from Jerusalem.

Huffington Post

Many of those we interviewed, including union leaders, did not believe that the revocation of their rights was necessary to balance budgets, but was rather part of a coordinated effort to dismantle unions and reduce their large financial and organizational contributions to progressive politics.

Huffington Post

Meanwhile, 24 other states, including Utah and Texas, have no specific laws regarding revocation of voting rights by a person assigned a guardian". On August 30, 2016, Lillie, an 88-year-old African-American woman, was abducted from a doctor's appointment while her niece was filling out paperwork in the other room.

HuffPost

But even these faded as news of the Spanish governor's revocation of the right of deposit reached the U.S. minister.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Previously, in May 2008, the court legalized same-sex marriage, and since the election, several groups have sued, saying the proposition's revocation of that right was unconstitutional.

The New York Times

Plainly, the piecemeal revocation of the right of way, whenever a patent is issued to a settler along the line, would increase the financial burden and add elements of risk to the investments, and so be inconsistent with the purpose of the act.

Cornell University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing legal or political matters, ensure the context clearly specifies which rights are subject to "revocation of rights", avoiding ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "revocation of rights" when the situation involves a mere restriction or limitation; reserve it for cases where rights are completely taken away.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "revocation of rights" functions as a noun phrase, typically serving as the subject or object of a sentence. It refers to the act of officially canceling or taking away rights. As Ludwig AI points out, this phrase is grammatically correct.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Academia

30%

Formal & Business

15%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

5%

Wiki

5%

Science

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "revocation of rights" is a grammatically correct and commonly used term to describe the act of officially canceling or taking away established rights. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's suitable for use in various contexts, particularly legal, political, and social discussions. While the phrase is generally neutral, its implications often lend it a more formal tone. When writing about this topic, clarity is crucial to ensure the context specifies which rights are being revoked. Alternatives such as "deprivation of rights" or "rescinding of rights" may be appropriate depending on the specific shade of meaning you wish to convey.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

deprivation of rights

Focuses on the act of taking rights away, emphasizing the loss experienced.

rescinding of rights

Highlights the formal cancellation or annulment of rights.

abrogation of rights

Implies a formal or legal nullification of rights.

nullification of rights

Emphasizes the act of making rights void or ineffective.

termination of rights

Suggests a complete end to the existence or validity of rights.

suspension of rights

Indicates a temporary removal of rights, implying a possible reinstatement later.

loss of rights

Focuses on the outcome of no longer possessing certain rights.

withdrawal of rights

Suggests a deliberate act of taking rights back or away.

infringement of rights

Highlights the violation or encroachment upon existing rights.

curtailment of rights

Implies a reduction or limitation of rights, rather than a complete removal.

FAQs

What does "revocation of rights" mean in legal terms?

In a legal context, "revocation of rights" signifies the formal cancellation or annulment of certain legal entitlements, privileges, or protections previously afforded to an individual or group. This can occur due to legislative changes, judicial decisions, or administrative actions.

How does "revocation of rights" differ from suspension of rights?

"Revocation of rights" implies a permanent or indefinite removal of rights, whereas "suspension of rights" suggests a temporary removal, with the possibility of reinstatement at a later time. The key difference lies in the duration and potential for restoration.

What are some potential consequences of the "revocation of rights"?

The consequences of "revocation of rights" can vary widely depending on the specific rights involved. Some potential consequences include loss of legal protections, diminished access to essential services, increased vulnerability to discrimination, and reduced participation in civic or political processes.

Can the "revocation of rights" be challenged or reversed?

Yes, the "revocation of rights" can often be challenged through legal or political means. Affected individuals or groups may pursue litigation, lobbying efforts, or public advocacy campaigns to seek the restoration of their rights. The success of such efforts depends on the specific circumstances and the legal or political context.