Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(10)
Secondary outcomes included LOS, revisit rate at 30 days, and admission rate at 30 days.
There were no statistically significant differences for baseline admission rate, revisit rate at 30 days, and readmission rate at 30 days between EDCC and non-EDCC patients.
While Landsat images have advantageous spatial and spectral characteristics for describing vegetation properties, the Landsat sensor's revisit rate, or the temporal resolution of the data, is 16 days.
When considering that cloud cover may impact any given acquisition, this lengthy revisit rate often results in a dearth of imagery for a desired time interval (e.g., month, growing season, or year) especially for areas at higher latitudes with shorter growing seasons.
We determined the revisit rate for each resource during these two periods (i.e., how frequently the resource was visited after the first known visit).
However parental education, which one of the main factors for improving revisit rate, was provided to only 2 patients, which invalidate the value of linking outcome to adherence.
Similar(50)
This is particularly useful when sensor revisit rates vary greatly.
However, affected by temporal revisit rates and cloud contamination, Landsat time series can only capture very limited temporal segments of vegetation phenology.
Comparison of baseline admission rates found no statistically significant differences between EDCC patients and non-EDCC patients in the odds of baseline admission, revisit at 30 days or readmission at 30 days: Admission rates (OR = 0.88; 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.12) Revisit rates at 30 days (OR = 1.19; 95% CI, 0.95 to 1.51) Readmission rates at 30 days (OR = 1.03; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.46).
No significant difference was noted in the revisit rates, but ondansetron was associated with an increase in episodes of diarrhoea.
When considering these results in detail, simulated revisit rates for rare species are significantly different from what we observed (Fig. 5), while simulated revisit rates for abundant species are similar to observed revisit rates when the detection field is 100 m (Fig. 5, DF 100).
More suggestions(1)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com