Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
From 1995 until 2010, 103,424 primary THAs and 16,524 revisions were recorded.
All revisions were recorded in the notes section of the database to ensure that every aspect as to why a question was revised was clearly identified.
Similar(58)
Numbers and indications for revision were recorded (Table 3).
Whether the whole prosthesis or parts of the prosthesis were removed or exchanged at revision and re-revision were recorded.
Reasons for revision were recorded by the surgeons in the operative forms of the TJRR and confirmed with chart review by a trained clinical research associate.
Surgical procedure (primary or revision) was recorded for each subject.
The time from initial operation to revision was recorded.
If more than 1 revision was recorded, only the first one was counted.
Date of surgery and date of any subsequent revision are recorded.
Unspecified reasons for revision ("other") were recorded in 27% of the HRA revisions as compared to 9% in THA revisions, the high numbers in the former group being due to the limitations of detailed revision data that were accessible.
Unspecified reasons for revision ("other") were recorded in 8% of the HRA revisions as compared to 5% of the THA revisions (Table 3).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com