Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
The proportion of cup or liner revisions has increased in Sweden and Norway compared to the previous report, probably due to the increased amounts of cementless implants (Havelin et al. 2009).
Registration completeness of primary procedures and revisions has increased since the DKR initiation and was 88% in 2010 for both procedures, compared with registration in the DNRP.
Similar(58)
However, these revisions have increased the complexity and subjectivity during evaluation, and thus might lead to interobserver variability and hamper its efficiency in routine clinical practise.
With the introduction of computer navigation to knee replacement surgery in Norway, the short term risk of revision has increased for the LCS complete implant.
With the introduction of computer-navigated knee replacement surgery in Norway, the short-term risk of revision has increased for computer-navigated replacement with the LCS Complete.
The proportion of periprosthetic fractures that were a reason for revision has increased in Sweden and Denmark but not in Norway compared to the previous report, which may be related to the increased use of uncemented implants.
Revision surgery has increased with 3,012 revision procedures carried out in 2003/4, rising to 6,581 by 2008/9 [ 2, 7] and accounting for approximately 9.4% of all THR procedures in England and Wales.
The use of trabecular metal (TM) cups in revision surgery has increased worldwide during the last decade.
The annual incidence of revision hip replacements has increased in both Canada and United States, particularly in younger adults.
Consistent with the increase in the proportion of firms whose preliminary releases contain pre-audit report date numbers, we show that the number of PEA revisions in our sample has increased over time from 12 in 2000 to 186 in 2005.
This results shows that the revision of BIO 181 has increased student satisfaction.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com