Sentence examples for revision range from inspiring English sources

When comparing the proximal cup migrations that we found reported here to the classification by Pijls et al. (2012), we identified 17 cups "at risk" of revision (range 0.24 0.77) and 7 cups with "unacceptable" migrations (range 1.01 1.34).

We also had a heterogeneous sample where patients' number of revision ranged from 2-6 in the subgroup with redo revision.

There were 4 relatively early revisions (range 8 22 months) and 3 later revisions (range 59 71 months).

Eleven of 13 TIPS patients required 2.5 ± 2.4 revisions (range: 0-8).

Previously reported success rates for two-stage revisions range from 86%to94%4%, which are consistent with our findings (Table  4) [ 5, 23, 25- 28].

There were 128 follow-up and 12 revision/re-intervention forms completeable (3 revisions, 8 new interventions, 1 combined revision and new intervention), with a mean time of 119 days for the follow-ups (range 3 468 days) and 48 days for the revisions (range 10 141 days).

The number of previous revisions ranged from 0 to 4, with increasing number of revisions associated with the outcome of failure in the logistic regression model (P = 0.02).

However, overall failure rates requiring revision surgery range from 13 to 89% in the literature.

Of the patients undergoing sinus surgery, failure rates, requiring revision surgery, range from 13 to 89%.

Our data are similar to those of several clinical studies, with a dislocation rate in revision surgery ranging from 2.1% to 20.9% with standard monoblock stems and from 1.3% to 11.3% with increased-modularity stems (Tables 3, 4).

In the MoM studies revision rates ranged from 0%to14.3%3%, after a follow-up of less than five years.