Sentence examples for revision patterns from inspiring English sources

Confirming with the previous literature, the results suggested that L2 proficiency played a significant role on test takers' revision patterns.

The results showed that task type also, but to a less extent, impacted on test takers' revision patterns.

As reported in previous studies, differences were observed between the high-scoring and low-scoring writers' revision patterns in terms of these measures.

A recent keystroke logging study by Barkaoui (2016) further investigated the impact of task type and second language proficiency on test takers' revision patterns between the TOEFL iBT independent and integrated tasks.

This section first presents the two students' performance on the test, followed by a comparison of their reading-into-writing processes in relation to overall text production patterns, writing fluency, pause patterns, transformation from sources, and revision patterns.

The research question is as follows: What similarities and differences are observed in the reading-into-writing process among two L2 learners (at different score levels) in terms of overall text production patterns, writing fluency, pause patterns, transformation from sources and revision patterns obtained from keystroke logging?

A change in the revision pattern took place, with more early revisions and less late revisions performed.

The revision pattern was different, however, and we observed 24 isolated patellar component additions in Sweden, but none in Klaipeda.

It appears that the revision pattern (cup and/or stem revision) is constant for a certain prosthesis type and that the less favorable approach aggravates this pattern slightly for some types of prostheses, but not all of them, as one might have expected.

In the case of HTTP, we observe that good signatures tend to define the section of an HTTP packet, e.g., with the Snort keywords header, method, uri, and revision, where pattern matching is performed.

Reflecting the military's wariness of abandoning Afghanistan, the revision follows a pattern established throughout Obama's presidency: to tell the American public that the "tide of war is receding", as his 2012 campaign mantra put it, while not actually stopping it.