Exact(5)
The book's fourth revision, in both traditional and modern language, was published in 1979.
A preformed antibiotic-loaded cement spacer was used for two-stage revision, and uncemented modular prostheses were implanted at revision in both groups.
The most common reasons for revision in both groups were loosening and infection.
Loosening, progression of disease, and pain were the main reasons for revision in both Australia and Sweden.
The most frequently reported reasons for revision in both the ceramic and metal head cohorts were infection and loosening (Tables 1, 2).
Similar(55)
All of these systems are undergoing revisions in both hardware and software components.
8 patients had revisions in both hips, resulting in a total of 1,780 hips for analysis.
Although revision rates in both groups were comparable, the time to revision was longer in the cups reconstructed with bone impaction grafting.
In 1,045 revision surgeries, both the hospital and prosthesis manufacturer were identical to those of the primary surgery (39.2 %).
Osteolysis ranks as the most significant cause of revision surgery in both total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
Content improvement was more significant from T1 to T2; there was reduction from T2 to T3, but improvement was maintained compared to T1 whereas the percentage of revision increased in both groups, with the best performance observed in IG-Combined and improvement maintained at T3, as shown in Fig. 2.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com