Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(60)
Thirty-six revision revision due to adverse local tissue reaction.
Two patients underwent a surgical revision due to lead migration.
Two patients were operated with wound revision due to deep infection.
The current study population consisted of patients with an isolated acetabular revision due to recurrent dislocation of their THA.
One patient required revision due to infection.
Revision due to dislocation and infection increased over time.
Outcome was defined as revision due to any cause.
Longer operating time was associated with revision due to infection.
Thus, revision due to infection and dislocation occurred earlier than revision due to aseptic loosening (Table 1).
Of all revisions performed during the first postoperative year, revision due to dislocation was the second most common reason after revision due to infection (n = 295).
We considered revision of any component for any reason and revision due to infection and stem revision for any reason and stem revision due to aseptic loosening.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com