Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
A revised taxonomic classification has been introduced for several of the human and animal fungal pathogens that are also part of the previous Zygomycota phylum [ 12– 12].
The incorporation of revised taxonomic data, and the investment in new coastal and oceanic expeditions will help to improve OBIS with better georeferenced data which will allow us to reevaluate the HC regional biodiversity patterns.
Similar(58)
However, denser taxon sampling for C. macrorhynchos and population sampling for other widespread species (e.g. Corvus enca and Corvus orru) is needed to properly revise taxonomic issues at species and subspecies levels.
Ribosomal sequence data further suggests that some morphologically homogenous groups (e.g. Oncholaimidae, Phanodermatidae) exhibit extensive molecular diversity, and further investigation will be required to fully describe this unexpected genetic structure and subsequently revise taxonomic frameworks.
As such, it has played a central role in molecular systematic efforts to revise the taxonomic classification of the Octocorallia.
With this information, the genus Cylindroleberis is also revised, providing a sound taxonomic framework for ecological, physiological and evolutionary research on this ostracod family.
Additional defining characters are needed to revise the linyphiid taxonomic system based on our phylogenetic hypothesis.
Herbarium vouchers were revised by F. Ehrendorfer, a taxonomic expert of the group.
The genus Campylobacter was introduced by Sebald and Verón [ 5] and its taxonomic structure has been revised a number of times [ 6- 8].
We support this taxonomic revision because Anthomastus ritteri, which has been revised by Molodstova (2013) as Heteropolypus ritteri, has the presumed octocoral ancestral gene order (Brockman and McFadden 2012), while our two morphospecies of what are presumably Anthomastus have a japonicum gene order.
The sequences and vouchers will stay the same although the taxonomic names may be corrected or revised.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com