Sentence examples for revised equation for from inspiring English sources

We recommend the use of the LoI method with the improved factor for conversion of OM to C content, or where bulk density is known the Warren equation for calculating accurate C density values across intact and logged forests on Indonesian peats, and our revised equation for oil palm sites.

Using the %renal uptake of Tc-99m DTPA and Cr-51 EDTA GFR, a revised equation for GFR was established through linear regression analysis.

We calculated the eGFR using a revised equation for the Japanese population: eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m) = 194 × serum creatinine−1.094 × age−0.287 × 0.739 (if female) [ 11].

Renal function was calculated using the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) with a revised equation for the Japanese population, as follows: eGFR (ml/min/1.73 m) = 194 × (serum creatinine)− 1.094 × (age)− 0.287 × 0.739 (for women) (Matsuo et al., 2009).

The results of the foregoing analyses indicated that there was little point in proceeding with the plan to re-run the ANOVA comparing the mean profile discrepancy indices for the summation and bipolar models using indices based on the revised equation for each model.

We found estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; mL/min/1.73 m) with the following revised equation for eGFR of serum Cr for Japanese subjects: eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m) = 194 × serum Cr−1.094 × age−0.287 (×0.739); values in the parentheses were applied for females (11).

The estimated GFR (eGFR) was defined as the average of (1) the GFR estimated from creatinine based on the revised equations for estimating GFR from the Lund-Malmo Study cohort [ 23] and (2) the GFR estimated from cystatin C [ 24].

Similar to Eq. (4), we have revised equation Eq. (5b) for Eq. (5a) n_{{{text{d}}, {text{ex}}}} = left( {1 - frac{{rho_{text{f}} }}{{rho_{text{d}}^{0} }}} right Kp times {text{TOC}} (5b where (rho_{text{d}}^{0}) is the dissolved gas density in kerogen; (n_{{{text{d}}, {text{ex}}}}) is the molar number of excessive dissolved gas.

Based on the similarity of the equation development approach, it is likely that applications using the Jenkins et al. [1] set would have essentially the same basis for employing the revised equations.

The parameters for the two revised equations were estimated using nonlinear regression analysis, as described before.

Based on the similarity of the equation development approach, it is likely that applications using the Jenkins et al. [ 1] set would have essentially the same basis for employing the revised equations.