Suggestions(1)
Exact(7)
Tempering the need to publish in high-IF journals and moving towards open access publishing models like PLOS ONE – which reviews papers on rigour and technical merit, rather than perceived significance – will give us the chance the make the next 50 years of science look very different.
This article reviews papers devoted to the investigation of photoinduced processes on non-semiconductor oxide catalysts.
A further 61 papers were identified from the reference lists of relevant systematic reviews, papers and clinical guidelines.
Analysis was limited to the "articles" and reviews papers indexed to HIV/AIDS in the ISI database.
On average, it takes over 6 years for research evidence to reach reviews, papers, and textbooks, and a further 9 years for this evidence to be implemented into practice [ 2].
It has been observed that, on average, it takes over 6 years for research evidence to reach reviews, papers, and textbooks, and a further 9 years for this evidence to be implemented into practice [ 49].
Similar(53)
Scientists are expected to contribute to the community by reviewing papers and serving on editorial boards.
That's why peer reviewed papers in journals are limited in number".
I like to wear the pants when I am reviewing papers.
There are plenty of review papers reviewing the area.
Since then 12,000 other users have reviewed papers, ResearchGate says.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com