Exact(1)
But after reading some of the takedowns, I feel ever-so-slightly inclined to defend Aslan: Not from the charge of being a self-promoter who's written an unconvincing book, but from the charge, implicit in some of the reviews, of having done something worse than many more credentialed authors who have published on this topic.
Similar(59)
Early reviews of "Recount" have been positive.
Reviews of Tightrope have been good.
But the reviews of Bridesmaids have been amazing, I say.
Over a dozen systematic reviews of homeopathy have been published.
However, initial reviews of Ping have not been flattering.
Several reviews of mechanochemistry have been published recently.
More recent reviews of hadrosaurids have concurred.
The reviews of Bigipedia have been mainly positive.
Several other reviews of ribozymes have appeared in the past 10 years.
No systematic reviews of aliskiren have been published.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com