Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(5)
"This whole culture of quarterly reviews needs to be disrupted.
This means that the comparison of clinical studies reporting implant stability outcomes generated by different versions of Osstell devices in (systematic) reviews needs caution and correction.
Every producer, publisher or consumer of systematic reviews needs to be aware that reporting standards exist.
Ways of supporting these authors and how to provide dedicated time to convert systematic reviews needs further consideration.
Thus, while systematic reviews of randomised trials can provide useful information on adverse effects of clinical interventions, the reporting of adverse effects in both randomised trials and systematic reviews needs to be improved.
Similar(55)
"Raisin," which got middling reviews, needed a few weeks to take off.
Dr. Stanley Jordan, director of transplantation at Cedars-Sinai, said such reviews needed to take account of mitigating factors like high P.R.A. levels that can affect patients' outcomes.
"Reviews need reducing not increasing!
The text obtained from reviews need to be classified into different languages, while working with a multi-lingual system.
Amongst potential problems in current medical publishing practice is that articles run out of date, and systematic reviews need updating.
But unlike on Instagram and other social apps, the hashtags in reviews need to be specific to be useful.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com