Sentence examples for reviewing errors from inspiring English sources

A12 Tsunami Alert Draws Inquiry State and federal officials are reviewing errors and technical breakdowns that delayed issuing a tsunami warning to millions of people in the San Francisco Bay Area.

Although the courts will generally avoid judicially reviewing errors of fact, a decision may be quashed if an error was made concerning a jurisdictional or precedent fact.

Good agreement was observed between panel members when reviewing errors, with the most common reason for exclusion at this stage being minor prescription writing incidents such as trivial spelling mistakes, missing information on prescriptions for use when required (eg, no indication, no minimum dosage interval) or writing medication names without using capital letters.

The checklist contains multiple sections that guide the data reviewer through the process of identifying the data transfer method, specifying the level of PHI that is approved for release, identifying the PHI elements in the data, and reviewing errors and other potential problems in the log file.

In order to help identify and review errors that occurred during resuscitation we educated our resuscitation teams using crew resource management and in March 2009 developed a checklist to be used for potentially high-risk resuscitations.

The willingness of the Court to review such errors of fact is an exception to the general rule that the Court only reviews errors of law.

Another exception to the general rule that courts will generally only judicially review errors of law is where action is taken or a decision is made on the basis of no evidence, a lack of sufficient evidence, or an error of material fact.

The House of Lords upheld this decision, determining that the issue of whether the applicants had accommodation was a question of fact to be determined by the public authority: An error as to a jurisdictional, or precedent, fact is an exception to the general rule that the High Court does not judicially review errors of fact.

In conclusion, we reviewed error reports to identify patterns of CPOE-related errors and used them to develop a new taxonomy and recurring error scenarios.

12 533 order lines were reviewed, 117 errors (errors rate 0.9%) were observed and 51% of these errors occurred on the first day of the hospital stay.

He wondered if "sentinel event analysis" — reviewing legal errors in a blame-free environment — could tease out the sequence of factors that might have contributed to a mistake and, perhaps, lead to a more accident-proof legal system.