Sentence examples for reviewer recommendation from inspiring English sources

Association of reviewer recommendations with the review model was tested in logistic regression with review model (open or single blind) as the response, and reviewer recommendation coded as a three-level categorical predictor (accept, revise, reject).

We used mixed model logistic regression analyses, with individual reviewer recommendation as the unit of analysis, to adjust reviewers' recommendations for review year and manuscript type (original research vs. other).

Subgroup analysis used stratification by ultimate acceptance or rejection, and reviewer recommendation of acceptance or rejection.

Therefore, per reviewer recommendation, we increased the number of splits to 1,000 that leads to a more smooth empirical distribution.

Association of reviewer recommendations with the final decision was tested in logistic regression with the final decision as the response and reviewer recommendation coded as a three-level categorical predictor (accept, revise, reject) with different effects for author-suggested and non-author-suggested reviewers.

For BMC Infectious Diseases (open peer review) and BMC Microbiology (single-blind peer review) the numbers of reviewer recommendations of each kind were similar, suggesting a lack of difference between open and single-blind peer review models (figure 2).

Retrospective analysis of the quality of reviewer reports using an established Review Quality Instrument, and analysis of reviewer recommendations and author satisfaction surveys.

To assess whether reports from reviewers recommended by authors show a bias in quality and recommendation for editorial decision, compared with reviewers suggested by other parties, and whether reviewer reports for journals operating on open or single-blind peer review models differ with regard to report quality and reviewer recommendations.

Second, to what extent do JGIM editors incorporate reviewer recommendations into their decisions?

For example, do they place more weight on reviewer recommendations than the data warrant?

We examined reviewer recommendations and editors' decisions at JGIM between 2004 and 2008.