Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(10)
Love Score reports offer a variety of customer insights, including how popular an app is versus others, analysis of app store reviews, reviewer quality and bias, and more.
Our main outcome measures were the mean review quality rating score for each reviewer, and the slope in change (improvement or deterioration) in editor-assigned reviewer quality ratings from their first review until the end date of the study.
On average, the top 1,000 apps with the worst Reviewer Quality Score had 409 ratings and 143 reviews.
When it came to the 100 apps with the absolute worst Reviewer Quality, 80% of them were on Android.
For other editors, a face-to-face meeting gives a better impression of reviewer quality than papers written.
"We then narrowed this more in-depth study to the 1,000 apps with the worst Reviewer Quality Score, as that's where we have the strongest signals," he adds.
Similar(50)
There were no disagreements between the primary and secondary reviewers' quality appraisals.
We hypothesized that a manuscript-specific and more extended intervention pairing new reviewers with high-quality senior reviewers as mentors would improve subsequent review quality.
Any differences of opinion between the original reviewer and quality control reviewer were resolved by discussion and referenced to the study paper.
Reviewer comments: Quality of written English: Acceptable The manuscript presents an SVM-based method for predicting antibody-specific epitopes.
This point is justified in Response 4 to Reviewer 2. Quality of written English: Not suitable for publication unless extensively edited.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com