Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(6)
Social interactive behavioral features are analyzed and compared between two user groups: one for a reviewer group whose reviews have been filtered as reviews not thought to be genuine reviews (spam), which we call the "fake review group"; another for the group whose reviews we believe, genuinely evaluate the business or the product (non-spam), which we call the "recommended review group".
It is a common task to construct the reviewer group with diverse background between reviewers.
Interrater reliability of the reviewer group was measured by calculating the cumulative monthly ICC each month.
(3) Set up reviewer group meetings for discussion, resolve discrepancies in variant interpretations, select variants for validation by Sanger sequencing, and trigger the validation process.
In general the on-site visit of the reviewer group at the maternity units did not substantially generate new ideas, even though it was regarded as being "nice and supportive".
The reliability of the reviews was maximised by: the use of experienced medical reviewers; providing reviewer training and written guidance; ongoing support from the research team with the opportunity to raise and discuss questions within the reviewer group; and the use of a structured data collection form.
Similar(54)
One reviewer grouped it with the 2005 book The Golden Spruce as part of a new genre: an "arbobiography".
There are more positive recommendations by Re than by Ra for only 11% of the manuscripts (there is no difference between the recommendations by the two reviewer groups for 67% of the manuscripts).
Consensus meetings were held to reach agreement within the surgeon and radiologist groups, and then between the reviewer groups.
Mean age and T1D duration were significantly different in the Routine Reviewer groups compared with the non-Routine Reviewers; however, the direction of the relationship was opposite in the two groups.
Inter-observer agreement was determined between reviewer groups; that is, the agreement between the consensus answers of the surgeon group and the consensus answers of the radiologist group was determined.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com