In particular, he requested copies of the comments from each reviewer, as well as the notes of the NSF program officer managing the awards.
(although this last was used by another reviewer as well).
Today I am a critic and a movie reviewer as well as a teacher.
We explain this further in the proposed point-by-point response to the reviewer as below.
Author response: The reviewer (as well as other reviewers, see above) raised an excellent point.
Disagreements regarding eligibility were resolved after consultation with a third reviewer (AS).
The cytoscape networks, which seems to concern the reviewer as well, were built after the Ontologizer analysis had been done.
Differences between reviewers were resolved by discussion or a third reviewer (AS, KH, KJ, EM, UP, KK).
As said, the methodological quality of all the selected publications was assessed by one reviewer and half of the publications by a second reviewer as well.
Below are the most substantive concerns; however we would encourage the authors to look at the more detailed comments from each reviewer as well.
