reviewer

USAGE SUMMARY

The word "reviewer" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to someone who evaluates and offers commentary on a particular product or service, such as a movie reviewer or book reviewer. For example: "The reviewer praised the movie for its high production values and engaging storyline."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

In fact here's your chance to show us what a great reviewer you are – send us a review of your favourite book.

The Guardian - Books

The Telegraph's reviewer was less keen, dubbing it "implausible and grandiose".

The Guardian

Looking at all the comments by the reviewer they suggested how the paper might be rewritten in the future to make it a solid contribution to science.

The Guardian

It was an "exceptionally strong performance" in the words of the Guardian film reviewer Peter Bradshaw.

The Guardian - Film

Click on the link provided and you discover the luckless reviewer receiving a lashing was, erm, Stephen Pritchard, who leads a challenging but honourably conducted double life as enraptured muso and implacable fault-finder general.

The Guardian

Pink, pinko … it's only one letter away people!" Another reviewer going by the name of Al Maginnes complained that letting his wife purchase the shoes "was a huge mistake".

The Guardian

In a reference to the demands the abortion legislation would impose on women wanting a termination, another reviewer wrote: "I'm very glad I didn't have to drive 13 hours to buy these shoes, and then return again the next day after the 24-hour waiting period.

The Guardian

Site member and reviewer KatWinter told us, "Gill Lewis makes you feel as though you are there with Scarlet and Red, fighting their fights and feeling their pain" and Lilybelle wrote "I couldn't stop reading it, and I was really upset to turn one of the last pages and find that the new chapter was in fact the epilogue".

The Guardian

And, though the Guardian's reviewer rightly argued that this book is the least "Martian" of Reid's poetry, A Scattering is shot through with unlikely metaphor and unfamiliar takes on the quotidian.

The Guardian - Books

The two leaders have also yet to reach agreement on reforming terrorism prevention and investigation measures (Tpims) after David Anderson, the independent reviewer of terrorism legislation, called for a strengthening of "locational constraints" in his annual report in March.

The Guardian

Self-flagellation was seen at its most merciless in last weekend's For The Record column in the Observer, where readers' editor Stephen Pritchard was characteristically stern in taking a classical CD reviewer to task for praising an oboist for his "almost 40 minutes of continuous solo" in Vaughan Williams's oboe concerto – in reality "the piece lasts barely 20 minutes", he pointed out scornfully.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When writing reviews, provide specific examples and avoid vague generalizations. This strengthens your argument and provides readers with concrete evidence to support your claims.

Common error

Avoid presenting reviews solely based on personal preference. Instead, balance subjective opinions with objective observations and analysis to offer a more comprehensive and balanced assessment.

Linguistic Context

The word "reviewer" functions primarily as a noun, referring to a person who writes reviews. Ludwig provides numerous examples where "reviewer" is used to identify individuals offering critiques on various subjects, ranging from books and films to legislation.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

70%

Formal & Business

15%

Science

10%

Less common in

Academia

2%

Encyclopedias

1%

Wiki

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The term "reviewer" is a noun denoting a person who provides evaluations or critiques. As indicated by Ludwig, the word is grammatically correct and frequently used across various domains, particularly in News & Media. While alternatives like "critic" or "evaluator" exist, "reviewer" specifically emphasizes the act of reviewing and commenting on a subject. Ludwig AI confirms that "reviewer" is perfectly acceptable in the English language.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

critic

Focuses more on judgmental assessment, often in arts and literature.

evaluator

Emphasizes formal assessment or appraisal of value or quality.

assessor

Highlights the role of determining the value or importance of something.

commentator

Suggests providing a running explanation or interpretation.

analyst

Focuses on detailed examination and interpretation of data or information.

judge

Implies an official or authoritative evaluation.

examiner

Highlights a formal testing or checking process.

appraiser

Emphasizes the determination of monetary worth or value.

reader

Indicates someone who reads and provides feedback, often in a literary context.

referee

Suggests an impartial third party evaluating something, especially in academic or scientific contexts.

FAQs

How is a "reviewer" different from a critic?

While both "reviewer" and "critic" evaluate and provide commentary, a "reviewer" often focuses on summarizing and assessing the quality of a work, whereas a critic tends to offer deeper analysis and interpretation.

What skills are important for being a good "reviewer"?

Strong analytical skills, attention to detail, excellent writing abilities, and subject matter expertise are crucial for providing insightful and informative reviews. Objectivity and fairness are also essential for maintaining credibility.

How to become a book "reviewer"?

Start by writing reviews on platforms like Goodreads or personal blogs to build a portfolio. Then, pitch your work to publications or websites that accept book reviews. Networking with other reviewers and authors can also help.

Which is correct, "reviewer" or "evaluator"?

"Reviewer" and "evaluator" are both correct, but they have slightly different connotations. "Reviewer" typically refers to someone who provides commentary on creative works, while "evaluator" suggests a more formal assessment of performance or quality in various contexts.