Suggestions(1)
Exact(1)
As a rule of thumb, this may take around 4 months, less if you have regularly reviewed your work and written papers or reports, more if you are starting with raw data, have no experience writing material for publication (this being the standard you will need to achieve), or are just a slow writer.
Similar(59)
And although you may think that you know the name of the person who reviewed your work--you may even be sure of it--you're probably wrong.
Finally, have someone review your work.
Even so, reviewing your work on a screen this small is like looking at the Grand Canyon through a keyhole.
A. It is, in fact, unsafe, if I'm reviewing your work, but I'm not asking you to collaborate with me and review mine.
Sound out the syllables, parse the jargon, look up the acronyms, and review your work several times.
You can also mention anyone you'd like not to review your work, a scientist working in a competing group, for instance.
Everyone is happy to see you, and no one reviews your work".
You need objective outsiders to review your work, especially from professional editors and proofreaders.
Have someone else review your work.
Retain an attorney to review your work.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com