reviewed version

USAGE SUMMARY

"reviewed version" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when a document has been revised, or when something has been looked at closely by a panel of experts. For example: "I've just submitted the reviewed version of the report to the board."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Academia

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

8 human-written examples

This is the pre-peer reviewed version of an article with the same title to be published in final form at the Journal of the European Financial Management Association.

Stanford University

Based on the final reviewed version of this document, a project steering group decides on product realisation.

Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society

CRL contributed with the statistical knowledge, analyzed the data and wrote the final reviewed version of the manuscript.

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

The patients' comments were taken into consideration by the expert panel and integrated when drafting a reviewed version of the questionnaire.

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

A backward translation of the reviewed version was then translated into Dutch, to verify that the meaning of each item of the scale was preserved.

Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source

The reviewed version of the translated PSS-10 was then back translated by the psychiatrist into English and compared to the original one in order to check for consistency.

BMC Psychiatry

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

52 human-written examples

CA conducted the interviews, assisted with the data analysis and reviewed versions of the manuscript.

BMC Medical Ethics

All authors designed the study and reviewed versions of the protocol.

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

Four evolutionary biologists reviewed versions of the test, but were not asked to provide specific feedback on each item individually.

CBE Life Sciences Education

Prof. Laetitia Rispel and Dr Paul Pronyk reviewed versions of this manuscript, and we are thankful for their support.

BMC Health Services Research

For reviewing versions of the database: R. Brown, D. Iskandar, I. Das, R. Pethiyagoda and D. Gower.

Plosone

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "reviewed version" to indicate that a document or piece of work has been examined and revised by someone other than the original author, ensuring clarity and accuracy.

Common error

Avoid using "reviewed version" when referring to a draft that has not yet been formally examined or revised. A draft is a preliminary version, while a reviewed version has undergone scrutiny and potential revisions.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "reviewed version" functions as a noun phrase, where "reviewed" acts as an adjective modifying the noun "version". It typically refers to a particular iteration of a document, manuscript, or file that has undergone examination and revision. Ludwig AI shows examples in academic, scientific and professional contexts.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

40%

Academia

30%

News & Media

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

3%

Wiki

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "reviewed version" is a noun phrase used to describe a document or piece of work that has undergone examination and revision. Ludwig AI indicates the phrase is grammatically correct and commonly appears in scientific, academic, and professional contexts. When using this phrase, ensure the content has indeed been scrutinized and revised; otherwise, a term like "draft" may be more appropriate. The related phrases provided offer alternative ways to express the idea of an examined and improved version, allowing for more nuanced communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

revised edition

Emphasizes the act of revising and updating a version, shifting the focus to the editorial changes made.

edited version

Highlights the editing process, where the text has been improved for clarity, accuracy, and style.

vetted version

Suggests a thorough and careful examination for accuracy and suitability, indicating a stamp of approval.

final version

Indicates the concluding iteration of a document, implying that it has completed its revision process.

proofread copy

Focuses on the error-checking process, assuring that the version has been corrected of any typographical or grammatical mistakes.

authenticated version

Conveys that the version has been verified as genuine or authoritative.

validated version

Implies that the version has been checked to ensure it meets specific criteria or standards.

scrutinized version

Stresses the careful and critical examination that the version has undergone.

verified copy

Highlights that the version has been checked for accuracy and truthfulness.

approved version

Indicates that the version has been officially endorsed or sanctioned.

FAQs

How is "reviewed version" used in academic writing?

In academic writing, "reviewed version" often refers to a manuscript that has been examined by peers or experts in the field and revised based on their feedback. This ensures the quality and validity of the research before publication. The "revised edition" is sometimes used as a synonym.

What is the difference between "reviewed version" and "revised version"?

While similar, "reviewed version" emphasizes the act of examination by an external party, while "revised version" highlights the changes made as a result of that review. A reviewed version may also be a revised version, but the emphasis differs.

Can "reviewed version" apply to software or code?

Yes, "reviewed version" can refer to software or code that has been examined for bugs, security vulnerabilities, or adherence to coding standards. Code reviews are a common practice in software development to ensure quality and maintainability. A "vetted version" has gone a step further.

What are some contexts where "reviewed version" is commonly used?

"Reviewed version" is commonly used in contexts such as academic publishing, legal documentation, software development, and any process where quality control and accuracy are paramount. You might also encounter "final version" to express a similar concept.