Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(60)
Peer-reviewed literature published in the English language between 1969 and 2003 was reviewed using Medline and hand searches.
Mr. Kincannon said that future requests would be reviewed using the same criteria that now existed for reimbursable projects.
But even if you're still learning, if you want people to pay money for your records/songs, I think it's fair that they get reviewed using fairly hardened criteria.
Data were reviewed using descriptive statistics.
Datasets were reviewed using FEI Inspect 3D.
All recordings were reviewed using Insight II, Persyst Development Corp. (Prescott, AZ).
They engaged in free searching and were directed towards sites previously reviewed using the framework.
Results were reviewed using frequencies to describe responses and formatted into tables.
Real 3D CAD models, obtained from an industry partner, were used as designs to be reviewed using the two methods.
The final sample of the studies fully reviewed using an equivalent number of structured templates comprised of 43 studies.
Each MOOC was reviewed using an analysis template developed ad hoc and divided into the following sections: 1) General aspects.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com