Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(18)
When Beth and I reviewed the interview findings, we found that trouble was brewing.
The BBC said that it had responded informally to Oliver, that it had "reviewed the interview", and that there was "no question of any kind of reprimand" for Davis.
But I had to because there were lots of reviews of the year in Germany of the success and they always reviewed the interview and wanted to know what I thought.
We reviewed the interview data for coding, presentation, and synthesis.
We reviewed the interview transcripts and applied the codes.
Specifically, both authors discussed the product histories and independently reviewed the interview transcripts.
Similar(42)
However, our interviewers were well-trained and they reviewed the interviews with senior researchers.
The Evaluators then reviewed the interviews again and a point of saturation was ensured if the same themes and sub-themes were identified in the second coding.
Using multiple close readings, two research team members (SLS and KSB) reviewed the interviews independently to generate a list of concepts and domains and to determine a preliminary coding scheme.
Many of the firms we spoke to suggested students review the interview guides posted on their company websites.
The analysis consisted of reviewing the interview material and documentary data.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com