Sentence examples for reviewed respondents from inspiring English sources

Course faculty (FHB, MKS) reviewed respondents' weekly case analyses and returned individualized comments to them each week.

Two authors (NH and SMcA) reviewed respondents' answers to the question "tell me about your decision to come and work in Ireland" within the qualitative interview.

First, we all initially reviewed respondents' comments as a working group and divided the comments into 1322 fragments, each of which had only a single meaning (eg, miscarriage following long working hours, depression following over work); these were recorded individually on cards.

Interpretation of factors involved comparing composite statement scores across factors and reviewing respondents' post-sorting comments.

The remaining two questions, one concerning "how performance is reviewed", required respondents to circle only one appropriate answer and the other on "how performance information is utilised" had six items which required yes or no answers.

Two researchers independently reviewed the respondent feedback in this phase and developed a list of statements containing information about dementia based on expert responses.

While reviewing the names of survey respondents using SCALE-UP in physics departments, we noticed that many actively participate in the physics education research community, a finding again consistent with DOI, which claims that early users are well educated and innovative in their fields.

In addition, over half of survey respondents think ethical review processes in the UK are having a positive or very positive effect.

Various methods were used to test the feasibility, acceptability and usability of the adapted instruments, including expert-panel review, respondent debriefing, simple testing (interviewer feedback), and behaviour coding from a sample of 18 participants with and without mental disorders.

Before the second workshop, the respondents reviewed their replies and were exposed to the nomenclature in the shippers' mitigation strategies, as presented in section 3. The results from the case study database, in conjunction with the discussions at the second workshop, resulted in the matrix presented in Table 2.

Although Edwards et al (2009) analysis is informative, <10% of the 513 survey studies reviewed included physician respondents.