reviewed on

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "reviewed on" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to indicate the date or time when something was reviewed or evaluated. Example: "The document was reviewed on March 15, 2023, and approved for publication."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

57 human-written examples

Game reviewed on DS.

The Guardian - Tech

Game reviewed on PC.

The Guardian - Tech

Game reviewed on PS3.

The Guardian - Tech

Game reviewed on Wii.

The Guardian - Tech

Game reviewed on iPad.

The Guardian - Tech

Game reviewed on Nintendo Wii.

The Guardian - Tech

Game reviewed on a PC.

The Guardian - Tech

Reviewed on an Xbox 360.

The Guardian - Tech

Game reviewed on Nintendo DSi.

The Guardian - Tech

Game reviewed on Nintendo DS.

The Guardian - Tech

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

I've reviewed on-line, on-air and in print since the early 90s.

Huffington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "reviewed on", ensure you clearly specify what is being reviewed and the basis or platform on which the review is conducted. For example, "The software was reviewed on the latest operating system".

Common error

Avoid using "reviewed on" without specifying the review's subject or platform. Vague statements like "It was reviewed on" lack clarity and reduce the sentence's informative value.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "reviewed on" functions as a verb phrase, indicating that a subject has undergone a process of evaluation or assessment in relation to a specific platform, date, or criteria. As evidenced by Ludwig's examples, this often appears in contexts discussing games, films, or policies.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

65%

Science

20%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Wiki

2%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "reviewed on" is a versatile verb phrase used to specify the platform, date, or criteria under which something was evaluated. As Ludwig AI indicates, the phrase is grammatically correct and frequently used, especially in news, media, and scientific contexts. For clear and effective writing, specify the subject and context of the review and consider alternatives like "evaluated on" or "assessed on" to add nuance. Remember to tailor your choice to the intended audience and purpose for maximum impact.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Evaluated on

Replaces "reviewed" with a synonym emphasizing assessment.

Assessed on

Similar to "evaluated on", focusing on the act of judging quality.

Examined on

Suggests a closer, more detailed inspection.

Inspected on

Implies a formal or official examination.

Checked on

A more casual alternative, implying a simple verification.

Audited on

Suggests a systematic and independent examination of records.

Vetted on

Emphasizes a thorough investigation for approval.

Considered on

Focuses on the act of thinking carefully about something.

Judged on

Implies a formal decision or verdict.

Critiqued on

Suggests a detailed analysis and evaluation, often with commentary.

FAQs

How can I use "reviewed on" in a sentence?

You can use "reviewed on" to specify the platform or date of a review, as in "The game was reviewed on PlayStation 5" or "The policy was reviewed on July 28, 2025".

What are some alternatives to "reviewed on"?

Alternatives include "evaluated on", "assessed on", or "examined on", depending on the context and the nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "reviewed on" or should I use "reviewed by"?

The choice between "reviewed on" and "reviewed by" depends on what you want to emphasize. Use "reviewed on" to indicate the platform or date of the review, and "reviewed by" to indicate the reviewer or the reviewing body.

What's the difference between "reviewed on" and "assessed on"?

"Reviewed on" typically implies a formal evaluation or critique, often in a published form, while "assessed on" suggests a more general evaluation or measurement of something. The terms can be used interchangeably depending on the specific context.