Fourth, key dimensions are missing in most of the reviewed instruments.
For our rating of the reviewed instruments we followed the instructions suggested by McDowell for summary tables [123].
Key domains that might potentially differentiate adaptive and maladaptive aspects of body awareness were missing in the reviewed instruments.
Yet two of these instruments have only 4 or 5 items, which brings up the question of which dimensions of the body awareness construct the reviewed instruments assess.
The second aim of this study was to assess the understanding that underlies the constructs in the reviewed instruments independent from the original authors' statements.
The authors did not find any published conceptual framework for any of the reviewed instruments.
JK reviewed instruments, results and reports, oversaw data collection and coordinated dissemination.
Only a small number of the reviewed instruments employed some method of validation.
We included all reviews that reviewed instruments for measuring patients' experience and satisfaction with resident or clinical doctors in general.
It is likely that there are more details on the development of the reviewed instruments that have not been considered in this review.
