Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
Prominent examples which will not be reviewed in this text include membrane systems.
Similar(59)
Slightly older literature in this area is reviewed in the text of Adam and Bellomo [ 150].
The four highlighted in bold are reviewed in the text.
Any abstracts or citations deemed potentially relevant by either reviewer were reviewed in full-text form by two independent reviewers.
Potentially relevant articles were acquired and reviewed in full text.
Of the 133 articles reviewed in full text, 36 articles, representing 31 distinct patient populations were analyzed based on our a priori inclusion-exclusion criteria and quality assessment [11] [46].
The search yielded 359 articles, of which 36 were reviewed in full text (fig 1).
The remaining 101 papers were reviewed in full text, and of these 95 were excluded.
Potentially eligible studies were then reviewed in full text following a similar procedure.
The remaining 22 papers were obtained and reviewed in full text format.
Therefore, 83 studies were reviewed in full text, 15 were included in the review, and 68 were excluded.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com