reviewed in

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "reviewed in" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a document, article, or study that has been examined or assessed within a specific context or publication. Example: "The findings of the study were thoroughly reviewed in the latest edition of the journal."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

(Reviewed in this issue).

The New Yorker

The show was well reviewed in Edinburgh.

The New York Times

It will be reviewed in tomorrow's Times.

The New Yorker

One more time," was reviewed in Artnet.

The New York Times

These will be reviewed in March 2003.

The Guardian

The reprieve will be reviewed in January.

The New York Times

What resource is reviewed in "Mapping Cyberspace"?

The New York Times

— David Denby (Reviewed in our issue of 10/13/08).

The New Yorker

— Anthony Lane (Reviewed in our issue of 6/4/07).

The New Yorker

It's reviewed in this issue by Alan Riding.

The New York Times - Books

— David Denby (Reviewed in our issue of 11/5/07).

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "reviewed in", ensure you clearly specify the source or context in which the review took place to provide clarity and credibility.

Common error

Avoid using "reviewed in" without specifying where the review occurred. For example, instead of saying "The book was reviewed in", specify "The book was reviewed in The New York Times" to provide clear context.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "reviewed in" primarily functions as a prepositional phrase, indicating the location or source where a review has been published or conducted. As noted by Ludwig, this phrase is commonly used to specify the context of the review.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

45%

Formal & Business

2%

Less common in

Wiki

2%

Academia

1%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "reviewed in" is a versatile and grammatically sound prepositional phrase used to indicate the source or location of a review. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's crucial for providing context and credibility. While the phrase is most common in news, media, and scientific contexts, ensure clarity by specifying the source of the review to avoid vagueness. Alternatives like "analyzed in" or "assessed in" can be used for subtle shifts in meaning. By following these guidelines, you can effectively use "reviewed in" to enhance your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

examined within

Suggests a close inspection or investigation, similar to a review but potentially more detailed.

analyzed within

Emphasizes a detailed examination of a subject within a particular framework; less common than "reviewed in".

evaluated within

Focuses on the judging or appraising of something in a specific environment.

assessed by

Focuses on the evaluation of something by a particular entity, which is a slightly different emphasis.

investigated in

Highlights a systematic or formal inquiry into a subject within a given setting.

discussed within

Highlights the act of conversation or debate about a topic in a certain context; broader than a review.

covered by

Indicates that a topic is included or addressed within a publication or discussion; less specific than a review.

considered in

Suggests that a topic was taken into account or deliberated upon in a particular context; less formal than "reviewed in".

featured in

Implies prominence or special attention given to a topic within a publication; broader than a review.

presented in

Suggests a formal introduction or showing of something in a certain context; less focused on evaluation than a review.

FAQs

How do I use "reviewed in" in a sentence?

Use "reviewed in" to indicate where something has been critically assessed. For example, "The movie was "favorably reviewed" in The Guardian" or "The study's methodology was "critically reviewed" in a scientific journal".

What can I say instead of "reviewed in"?

Alternatives include "analyzed in", "assessed in", or "evaluated in", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey. Each of these alternatives highlights a different aspect of examination or assessment.

Is it better to say "reviewed by" or "reviewed in"?

"Reviewed by" typically refers to the person or entity doing the review (e.g., "reviewed by critics"), while "reviewed in" refers to the publication or source where the review appears (e.g., "reviewed in The New Yorker"). Choose the phrase that accurately reflects your intended meaning.

What does "peer reviewed in" mean?

"Peer reviewed in" signifies that a work, typically a scientific or academic paper, has been "subjected to peer review", a process where experts in the field evaluate the work before publication in a journal or other scholarly outlet. This process aims to ensure the quality and validity of the research.