Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(23)
We report the results of a prioritisation project, aiming to identify highest priority systematic review topics.
Each section features worksheets that review topics covered in discussion section.
PCQI lead trainers will be present to review topics and answer questions.
One of the design review topics is the selection of materials, material procurement, and assessment of material performance during operation.
The purpose of this study was to assess the presence and effectiveness of existing systems of prioritization for Cochrane review topics and to explore methods of improving those systems.
In the context of such uncertainty, we present pragmatic recommendations that promote transparency and reproducibility in processes, address methodological advances in the risk-of-bias assessment, and can be applied consistently across review topics.
Similar(37)
Seven out of eight reviews identified at least one controlled trial that was relevant for the review topic.
We explored how many EPOC reviews consider and identify nonrandomized studies, and whether the proportion of nonrandomized studies identified is linked to the review topic.
Lastly, a thorough assessment of quality would require clinical knowledge of the individual review topic areas.
Further, we hand-searched the Journal of Clinical Microbiology, a high-yield journal for this review topic.
This indicates that the review topic is relatively under-researched.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com