Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(33)
Of the remaining references, only 277 were considered relevant to the review topic by two independent reviewers, and assessed for methodological quality.
Seven out of eight reviews identified at least one controlled trial that was relevant for the review topic.
We explored how many EPOC reviews consider and identify nonrandomized studies, and whether the proportion of nonrandomized studies identified is linked to the review topic.
Lastly, a thorough assessment of quality would require clinical knowledge of the individual review topic areas.
Further, we hand-searched the Journal of Clinical Microbiology, a high-yield journal for this review topic.
This indicates that the review topic is relatively under-researched.
Similar(26)
We report the results of a prioritisation project, aiming to identify highest priority systematic review topics.
That means a business can see new reviews as they appear, and also drill down on specific review topics.
There are 12 different source and target domain pairs that are created from four unique review topics.
One of the design review topics is the selection of materials, material procurement, and assessment of material performance during operation.
There is no reason to believe that cluster searching is not generalizable to other review topics.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com