Sentence examples for review to answer from inspiring English sources

"Of course, if I'm going to government, I'm going to challenge the strategic defence review to answer that question in the toughest way – that if it turns out the only way strategically to deliver continuous[ly] at sea is four boats, then absolutely we will have four boats.

We performed an evidence-based review to answer 3 questions: Are steroids beneficial?

We performed a formal evidence-based review to answer this question: In patients with unilateral vocal cord paralysis, does AA combined with MT significantly improve subjective and objective voice outcomes compared with MT alone?

3 This paper describes the literature review to answer the question: "What is the long-term safety of methotrexate, including cardiovascular diseases, malignancies, infections and liver toxicity?".

We included five systematic reviews and 21 trials (20 of which were randomised) in this review to answer these four questions.

The authors will carry out a realist review to answer the following research question: what are the outcomes of user fee exemption policies implemented in Africa?

The objective of this study was to use standard deviation data available from trials meeting the inclusion criteria of two systematic reviews to answer the following three questions about BP variability: Does blood pressure entry criterion have an effect on baseline BP variability?

We have used the availability of a large amount of resting research setting BP data from 33,611 patients, accumulated as part of two systematic reviews, to answer whether thiazides affect BP variability and describe some other characteristics of BP variability [4] [7].

The EPPI approach juxtaposes several reviews to answer different subquestions, which together make up a very broad main research question.

Policymakers should take into account their quality and the local applicability of their findings when using systematic reviews to answer questions about benefits, harms and costs.

There is little guidance on methods to conduct systematic reviews to answer questions about adverse effects, adverse events or patient harms albeit a few methodological reviews explore the challenges (e.g. [ 24, 25]) and the merits of including various study designs (e.g. [ 26, 27]).