Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(2)
In the light of above literature review, this section presents the security knowledge gaps that should be covered to build a reliable, applicable and trustworthy Fog platform.
Be sure to review this section carefully so that you know who can see what.
Similar(57)
However, I reviewed this section of the privacy policy, and didn't think I was violating any of it with my script.
For completeness of the review, in this section we outline theoretical works underpinning the use of gamification in education, published within the review period.
We will make a brief review on this section and describe their essential differences with our work.
In general, the papers that we review in this section have addressed the dynamics of FA response to force.
Besides, some subspace-based techniques related to our work are also reviewed in this Section.
In summary, the literatures reviewed in this section involved cogen that embodied features of PAR.
The main topics of the Persson's model of contact mechanics are reviewed in this section.
PAPR for OFDM and FBMC are also reviewed in this section.
Some of the important investigations on forced convection in nanofluids are reviewed in this section.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com