Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(1)
After completing these revisions, we had three other experts in college science teaching and the SESs review this draft of the second version of the inventory.
Similar(59)
Local (authors) and national (listed in acknowledgements) EoE experts in the fields of allergy, gastroenterology, and psychology then reviewed this draft.
The Working Group reviewed this draft to ensure that the structure and the language were appropriate for the professionals that the guidelines target.
The peer panel then reviewed this second draft making some further amendments.
The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/13/170/prepub wouldulikeike to acknowledge Florence Baron-Papillon and Laurence Sanofiell-Vallejo (Sanofi Pasteur MSD, Lyon, France) for their contributions in reviewing the draft versions of this manuscript.
"While we continue to review and think through this draft, it's clear it doesn't go nearly as far as those in the Bitcoin community would want," he said in an email message.
Two other review authors commented on this draft and a final version was agreed.
Based on this review, draft competencies for primary health care pharmacists were prepared.
JI reviewed the draft.
SC reviewed the draft.
ME reviewed the draft manuscript.
More suggestions(4)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com