Sentence examples for review the differences from inspiring English sources

This paper is to review the differences in the developments of microfluidic chips for extracting genomic deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and viral ribonucleic acid (RNA) from blood by the Biosensor Focus Interest Group BFIGG) in Singapore.

I mentioned the 6020 at the beginning of the review; the differences between it and the 8010 are that the 6020 has only 1GB of internal memory, is slightly less rugged in all ways (but still rugged), and has a slightly slower lens.

In this review, the differences in PSA screening practice, reported incidence and prognosis of prostate cancer, and genetic factors between the populations in East and West factors are discussed.

(Teachers may want to review the difference between statistical and anecdotal data with the class before proceeding).

After students have finished their hunt, ask the following questions to debrief this activity and introduce the theme of the lesson: Younger students might enjoy watching this Grammarheads video at this point to review the difference between fact and opinion.

But one such master, Albert Hadley, after reviewing the differences between curtains and draperies -- he never says "drapes" -- said that he prefers a simple window, often one with no curtains at all.

In addition, they reviewed the differences between this species and other Holochilus and concluded that these were significant enough to place the former in a distinct genus, which they named Lundomys after Lund, who had collected the original material.

After reviewing the differences in the bilateral relationship, then and now, he asked rather pointedly, "What happened to account for this change and where will it lead us?" The journalist recalled that when he had appeared at the group's founding conference, in 2010, relations were at an all-time low.

The investigators reviewed the differences in coding and resolved them.

Clinical heterogeneity will be assessed by reviewing the differences across trials in characteristics of randomised patients.

We critically reviewed the differences in portrayal across four tracks with SPs trained by the same trainer and for one case by two trainers across two locations.